Lockport broker pleads guilty to not warning family about lead paint in home

By  | Published  | Updated 

The Buffalo News
A Lockport real estate broker admitted she failed to warn a family about lead paint exposure in the home they were buying, the U.S. Attorney’s Office announced Thursday.

One year later, their child was diagnosed with lead poisoning, according to officials at the office.

Maureen S. Walck, 72, a broker with RealtyUSA, pleaded guilty Thursday before U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy to failure to provide lead paint hazard warning notice, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.

Walck had listed a Lockport home built around 1900 and the owner was aware lead-based paint hazards were present, officials said. The owner showed Walck a copy of the inspection reports.

But when the contract was drawn up, it indicated the seller had no knowledge of the hazards and there were no records. The sale closed in April 2014, and the child’s diagnosis came in September 2015, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.

Sentencing was set for Dec. 11.

Cory Dickes · 

if only parents could teach their kids to not eat paint.
LikeReply3Sep 8, 2017 11:21pm
Sarah McGowan · 

Lead can get into the air from opening/closing windows or doors that have lead paint in the frames.
LikeReply1Sep 9, 2017 4:55am
Robert Hauser

Sarah McGowan Then all the ocupants would of tested for lead poisioning, not just the child.
LikeReplySep 9, 2017 5:50am
Sarah McGowan · 

Robert Not necessarily. Kids play with toys on the floor (that has lead dust) and/or put their hands into their mouths, etc
LikeReplySep 9, 2017 12:51pm
Mike James

House was built “around” 1900…unless that house was totally gutted and rebuilt, common sense would tell you that it there is the possibility of lead paint somewhere. While the broker was wrong, the onus is on the home owners to ensure a house that is over hundred years old is safe for their child.
Denise Cuneo · 

But you can still go to the RealityUSA and see the brokers info and her listed properties? Why is she still working? Why didn’t she lose her license? I say Boycott RealityUSA until they fire the witch.
Nancy Rebrovich · 

Who inspected this house before the closing? What about that person?
LikeReply1Sep 8, 2017 11:49am
Morgan Grimes

Home inspections are optional.
LikeReply1Sep 9, 2017 2:14am
Gary Borek

What about the sellers? They had to sign the contract. Did they not read it and say “hey, it says we have no knowledge, but in fact we do, we can’t sign this….”?
LikeReply2Sep 8, 2017 10:53am
Ivy Power

Maureen Walck …I can only hope this was an oversight on your part.
Errol Daniels · 

And to those who hate regulations….
LikeReply3Sep 8, 2017 9:20am
Dale Lawson · 

This is soo sad! There is safeguards in place and someone deliberately ignored them, why? For money! Ugh
leadpaint
Author: leadpaint


Posted

in

by

Tags: